The AP reports that last year, nearly "100,000 tests for breast cancer gene mutations were done," and as more women undergo the test, parents may now be facing "a tough question: Should we test the kids?" A number of "medical experts advise against such testing before age 25, saying that little can be done to prevent or screen for breast or ovarian cancer until then, so the knowledge would only cause needless worry." But various studies and interviews "show that many people who have BRCA gene mutations -- and even more of their offspring -- disagree." Still, "research...shows there can be benefits to at least talking about testing and inherited cancer risks with teens." This inherited risk could be lowered by taking "anti-estrogen drugs or having [one's] breasts or ovaries removed," but "these drastic measures are not advised for very young women." In fact, "mammograms are not advised till age 25." In light of these facts, some medical groups "say that when the risk of childhood cancer is low and nothing can be done to lower it, children should not be given gene tests."
Experts, parents discuss the possibility of testing children for breast cancer gene mutations.
Categories:
Categories
- Access (11)
- Add category (1)
- Alerts (6)
- Chronic Disease (42)
- Community Health (22)
- Economics (63)
- Environment (37)
- Food Safety (6)
- Genetics (5)
- Health Education (4)
- History (7)
- Immunizations (40)
- International Health (40)
- MCH (3)
- Prevention (437)
- Surveillance (96)
- Technology (34)
- The future (20)
- Toxicology (19)
- behavioral change (52)
- complementary substances (10)
- epidemiology (124)
- geriatrics (6)
- infectious diseases (38)
- policy (253)
- research (205)
- zoonosis (18)
Monthly Archives
- June 2009 (20)
- May 2009 (12)
- April 2009 (15)
- March 2009 (26)
- February 2009 (25)
- January 2009 (24)
- December 2008 (24)
- November 2008 (29)
- October 2008 (35)
- September 2008 (13)
- August 2008 (22)
- July 2008 (35)
- June 2008 (24)
- May 2008 (17)
- April 2008 (28)
- March 2008 (20)
- February 2008 (30)
- January 2008 (34)
- December 2007 (16)
- November 2007 (22)
- October 2007 (44)
- September 2007 (38)
- August 2007 (56)
- July 2007 (43)
- June 2007 (49)
- May 2007 (56)
- April 2007 (41)
- March 2007 (54)
- February 2007 (30)
- January 2007 (41)
- December 2006 (25)
- November 2006 (32)
- October 2006 (23)
- September 2006 (13)
- August 2006 (19)
- July 2006 (19)
- June 2006 (26)
- May 2006 (39)
- April 2006 (24)
- March 2006 (34)
- February 2006 (38)
- January 2006 (40)
- December 2005 (22)
- November 2005 (78)
- October 2005 (70)
- September 2005 (60)
- August 2005 (54)
- July 2005 (46)
- June 2005 (16)
Pages
Search
Links
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by published on September 22, 2008 12:26 PM.
More Than Skin Deep: There's No Such Thing As A 'Safe' Suntan, Researchers Warn was the previous entry in this blog.
New cancer-screening strategy uses the immune system to signal early signs of disease is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Leave a comment