<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Dr. Buttery&apos;s Public Health BLOG</title>
      <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:45:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Safety of H1N1 Shots.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: normal; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class="inside-copy"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><font size="2"><font color="#000000">One in every 10,000 Californians who contracted H1N1 died, statistics from the State Department of Health show.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Out of 13 million Californians who were vaccinated for H1N1, three people died. In one case, the patient already had the flu and a streptococcus infection when vaccinated. One was a cardiac patient whose death the coroner ruled was related to pre-existing heart problems. And the final case is still being reviewed by health officials.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Comment</b>: Yet the anti immunization activists continue to get Media space, despite study after study showing how much safer immunizations are than the diseases they control.<o:p></o:p></font></font></span></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/safety-of-h1n1-shots.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/safety-of-h1n1-shots.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Immunizations</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">epidemiology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">infectious diseases</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:45:12 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>New malaria vaccine is safe and protective in children</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">From the Maryland University Center for vaccine development ( with cooperation with several other major research groups we learn that a study on effectiveness of a new vaccine against Falciparum Malaria, the most common and most dangerous strains, <span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span>appears to be successful in stimulating antibody protection as great or greater than that of adults who have survived many years of exposure to become resistant to malaria.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>While this is good news for the millions of children who would otherwise die from malaria each year the international community must ensure that agricultural productivity in increased in developing countries so that further generations of children no longer killed by malaria do not survive just to die from starvation.<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/new-malaria-vaccine-is-safe-and-protective-in-children.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/new-malaria-vaccine-is-safe-and-protective-in-children.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Immunizations</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">epidemiology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">infectious diseases</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">research</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:11:40 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>New Nutritional Labeling Planned</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><font color="#000000">Serving Size Snafu- today&#8217;s NYT video is well worth watching as it discusses how poorly caloric and other information appears on packages of food, and bears little relation to what people actually eat. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span>This may well contribute to today&#8217;s obesity as people become frustrated with packing ;labels.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>The FA is planning new labeling criteria where the calorie, salt etc content of portions people actually eat will be placed on packages, instead of labeling a portion as 6 potato chips or half a bran muffin which few if any are likely to follow. Comment: I applaud thus move but note we might have been better off if Congress had not written in stone almost 2 decades ago what a portion should be.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>This is the difference between making laws and giving advice. Congress should require guidance from appropriate advisory bodies such as the I.O.M. rather than trying to set science on stone. . <o:p></o:p></font></span></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/new-nutritional-labeling-planned.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/new-nutritional-labeling-planned.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:22:39 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Outcome based Coverage</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><font color="#000000">In today&#8217;s NEJM [V362:377-379,2-4-2010] A perspective on the growing demand for relevant outcomes in the Medicare population is important reading bearing in mind the concurrent news that current medical spending is over 17% of the GNP, mainly driven by medical care for chronic disease among the elderly. This should mean more translational research into effectiveness of prevention and care for chronic diseases. Instead of researching the value complementary medicine (which so far has been dismal) and activist causes, we should focus on the issues that drive the budget.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>The more we spend on medical care, the less we can spend on education and job creation. Although we do not like the term rationing, we cannot provide everything that everyone wants. We should focus on providing care where outcomes, fewer deaths, better daily function and reduced disability are validated by careful epidemiologic studies..<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/outcome-based-coverage.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/outcome-based-coverage.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Economics</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:20:10 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Cancer Prevention.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">At least one-third of all cancer cases are preventable.</span></b><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"> Prevention offers the most cost-effective long-term strategy for the control of cancer. Tobacco is the single largest preventable cause of cancer in the world today. It causes 80-90% of all lung cancer deaths, and about 30% of all cancer deaths in developing countries, including deaths from cancer of the oral cavity, larynx, esophagus and stomach. A comprehensive strategy including bans on tobacco advertising and sponsorship, tax increases on tobacco products, and cessation programs can reduce tobacco consumption in many countries. The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, adopted in May 2003, aims to curb tobacco-related deaths and disease.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Other cancers are preventable by changes in diet, exercise, alcohol use, and by immunizations. <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Comment:</b> The problem is that the prevention techniques call for changes in behavior, which the health profession manages poorly.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/cancer-prevention.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/cancer-prevention.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Chronic Disease</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">epidemiology</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:18:14 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Reducing Dietary Sodium.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto" class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #212f8f; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'">A valuable article in today&#8217;s JAMA[</span><font color="#000000"><em><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi">JAMA.</span></em><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">&nbsp;2010;303(5):448-449]</span></font><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #212f8f; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'"> appropriately questions the rush for legal restriction of food content by certain states.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Most recently the plan to restrict sodium in New York.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>The authors of the article note that the law is based on belief rather than a solid scientific foundation where a large cohorts<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>representative of the U.S. populations has been followed long enough to evaluate outcomes. The authors note that similar restrictions of Trans Fats and Post Menopausal Hormone Therapy have not had<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>the scientific base that epidemiology should have required. <b>Comment:</b> There is a continuing problem of activist public health practitioners believing that legal enforcement of behaviors is better than an educational approaches.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>It is harder to change laws when they are found wanting, compared to changing an educational message in response to new data. A new law may provide good political sound bites but we have a long way to go before we know how to change behavior, and many question whether laws should be to change behavior.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>This smacks of the Brave New<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>World of Aldous Huxley....<o:p></o:p></span></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/reducing-dietary-sodium.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/reducing-dietary-sodium.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Food Safety</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">epidemiology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">research</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:20 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Study Says Lead May Be the Culprit in ADHD </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto" class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'; COLOR: #333333; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">This was just a theory until quite recently, but two recent studies now provide strong evidence. The first study compared children formally diagnosed with ADHD to controls, and found that the children with the disorder had slightly higher levels of lead in their blood. This study showed a link only between blood lead and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms, not inattention. But a second study showed a robust link between blood lead and both parent and teacher ratings of ADHD symptoms, including both hyperactivity and attention problems. In both studies, the connection was independent of IQ, family income, race, or maternal smoking during pregnancy. <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Comment:</b> I do not know how many time we have to ask &#8221;when will we get lead out of children&#8217;s environments, rather than testing the blood before we intervene?&#8221;</span><b><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Tahoma','sans-serif'; COLOR: #212f8f; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/study-says-lead-may-be-the-culprit-in-adhd.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/study-says-lead-may-be-the-culprit-in-adhd.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Environment</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">epidemiology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:32:46 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>WSJournal criticizes FDA pronouncement on bisphenol A.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: 13.5pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt">In an editorial, the <a href="http://mailview.custombriefings.com/mailview.aspx?m=2010020102ama&amp;r=3957914-e6bc&amp;l=019-4bb&amp;t=c"><span style="COLOR: #0e4d96">Wall Street Journal</span></a> (1/30, A14) criticized the FDA's recent pronouncement on bisphenol A, saying that the compound is very common and protects people from exposure to more harmful substances. </span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-ansi-language: EN" lang="EN">In 2007, the environmental activists organized a "baby rally" where they equipped mothers and toddlers with signs reading "Don't Pollute Me." In response to the public outcry, confused and panicked retailers tossed plastic baby bottles and other BPA-containing products from their shelves. When the head of Health Canada's investigation of BPA Mark Richardson let slip in a speech to a medical group in Arizona that "exposures [to BPA] are so low as to be totally inconsequential, in my view," antichemical crusaders pressed the government to investigate Mr. Richardson's bias. He was abruptly reassigned. In its January update the FDA notes that BPA does not pose a risk at low levels of human exposure. Yet it goes on to recommend ways to limit exposure. Antichemical crusaders are likely to drive years of opposition through that crack of suspicion.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span></span><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">Comment:</span></b><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"> Is this another case of political correctness overcoming scientific knowledge?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>How often do we have to repeat history. Following the Love Canal hysteria in New York, the dioxins in oil in the<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>northwest, and the DDT in Triani, Alabama.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>In every case, after years of study no relationship was found between the supposed exposures and human diseases after spending millions of dollars..</span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/wsjournal-criticizes-fda-pronouncement-on-bisphenol-a.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/02/wsjournal-criticizes-fda-pronouncement-on-bisphenol-a.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Economics</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Environment</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">epidemiology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:29:33 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Swine Flu Backlash.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="3" face="Calibri">In the Lancet today is a valuable article on &#8221;swine flu backlash&#8221; [V</font><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.library.vcu.edu/science?_ob=PublicationURL&amp;_tockey=%23TOC%234886%232010%23996240287%231641090%23FLA%23&amp;_cdi=4886&amp;_pubType=J&amp;view=c&amp;_auth=y&amp;_acct=C000039639&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=709070&amp;md5=5b58b6799827b5a97636ebb1d57e2921"><span style="COLOR: blue"><font size="3" face="Calibri">olume 375, Issue 9712</font></span></a><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">, 30 Jan, 2010, Page 367] where the author considers whether the recent pandemic is the weakest on record, and how much the pharmaceutical industry and power politics caused needless waste of medical resources, engendering unnecessary fear. The author also asks &#8220;how was it that a new virus turned out on closer inspection not to be so new after all? Epidemiologists <span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span>knew it was likely to be mild almost from the beginning, but we feared that because it was &#8216;new&#8217; it would spread widely and kill a lot of people by virtue of the sheer numbers infected. <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Comment:</b><span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>It is always easy to second guess recent events, but science was overwhelmed again by politics as it was for Mad Cow Disease and the <span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span>outbreak of &#8216;swine flu&#8217; forty years ago. In both instances the flu outbreak was use to divert the public from a national problem, in this case the economic collapse. Once again the media, politics and the lobbyists trumped science. Instant response was demanded for a problem that needed some careful analysis first.<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/01/the-swine-flu-backlash.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/01/the-swine-flu-backlash.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Economics</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Immunizations</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">infectious diseases</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:58:02 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Teen pregnancy rate increases as both births and abortions rise.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #333333; FONT-SIZE: 9pt">From the <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/media/nr/2010/01/26/index.html">Guttmacher Institute</a> today we find that for the first time in more than a decade, the nation&#8217;s teen pregnancy rate rose 3% in 2006, reflecting increases in teen birth and abortion rates of 4% and 1%, respectively.. But, for the first time since the early 1990s, overall rates of pregnancy and birth&#8212;and, to a lesser extent, rates of abortion&#8212;among teenagers and young women increased from 2005 to 2006. It is too soon to tell whether this reversal is simply a short-term fluctuation, a more lasting stabilization or the beginning of a longer-term increase. Preliminary data on births for 2007 show a further increase in the birthrate among all women, including teenagers and those aged 20-24. The data presented here indicate that there are still large and long-standing disparities in rates by race and by state. These disparities echo those seen among unintended pregnancy rates, which are several times higher for women of color. <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Comment:</b> In media reports some question whether this increase is related to the federal government&#8217;s initiatives to push abstinence programs (part of the current health care plan) <span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span>that have been repeatedly shown to fail.<o:p></o:p></span></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/01/teen-pregnancy-rate-increases-as-both-births-and-abortions-rise.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/01/teen-pregnancy-rate-increases-as-both-births-and-abortions-rise.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">MCH</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">behavioral change</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">epidemiology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:49:34 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Changing Behavior</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The two selections from this week's papers indicate that we prefer to rediscover behaviors rather than&nbsp;chang them, probably because it is easier to discuss them than change them. Behavioral science, like econmics, is a dismnal science when applied to tranlastional research that is important to the health of people.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: 13.5pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt">Reducing Salt Use.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: 13.5pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The <a href="http://mailview.custombriefings.com/mailview.aspx?m=2010012101ama&amp;r=3957914-0d7a&amp;l=003-e38&amp;t=c"><span style="COLOR: #0e4d96">New York Times</span></a> (1/21) reports that for the study, appearing in the New England Journal of Medicine, researchers used "a computerized model that analyzed previous studies to estimate the benefits of salt reduction." They found that although "everyone would benefit from less salt...people at higher risk for heart problems -- blacks, people with hypertension, and people over 65 -- would benefit most." <span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span>The study showed that a national program to lower salt consumption could save between $10 billion and $24 billion in health costs each year, the <a href="http://mailview.custombriefings.com/mailview.aspx?m=2010012101ama&amp;r=3957914-0d7a&amp;l=004-d76&amp;t=c"><span style="COLOR: #0e4d96">Wall Street Journal</span></a> (1/21) reports. The researchers noted that for each dollar spent on such a program, the federal government could save $6 to $12 in Medicare health expenditures, <a href="http://mailview.custombriefings.com/mailview.aspx?m=2010012101ama&amp;r=3957914-0d7a&amp;l=005-908&amp;t=c"><span style="COLOR: #0e4d96">Reuters</span></a> (1/21, Emery) reports. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Comment:</b> Why hasn&#8217;t this data been acted on already? When I was at medical school more than 50years ago I was taught about the ill effects of excess salt intake.</span></p>
<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: 13.5pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt"></span>&nbsp;</p><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 9pt"><o:p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">A minimum price for alcoholic drinks?<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">The BMJ, this week, has a valuable editorial recommending a minimal price for alcoholic drinks in an effort to diminish the ill effects of overconsumption. The editorial follows advice from <span style="COLOR: #333333">BMA, the Royal College of Physicians, the Faculty of Public Health and the Royal Society<sup> </sup>for Public Health <span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>It is hoped that such pricing would drive down excess use of alcohol, as has increased pricing for tobacco products.<o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"></font></font></b></o:p></span></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/01/changing-behavior.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/01/changing-behavior.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:03:18 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>USPSTF and mammography</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The current issue of JAMA contains several excellent articles discussing the recent mammmogrpahy recommendations. In particular Dr. Steven Woolf discusses the problem of&nbsp;writing recommendations, bearing in mind the breast cancer activists and the media frenzies about&nbsp;perceived recommndations affecting health care, in the current health policy environment.&nbsp;]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/01/uspstf-and-mammography.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/01/uspstf-and-mammography.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">epidemiology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:04:44 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Calorie Information from Restaurants, Packaged Foods.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">Researchers at Tufts University analyzed the calorie content of 18 side dishes and entrees from national sit-down chain restaurants, 11 side dishes and entrees from national fast food restaurants and 10 frozen meals purchased from supermarkets. They compared their results to the calorie content information provided to the public by the restaurants and food companies. On average, the calorie content information provided by the restaurants was 18 percent less than the researcher's calorie content analysis. Two side dishes exceeded the restaurant's reported calorie information by nearly 200 percent. <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Comment</b>: Calorie labeling of food makes good sense but current codes on labeling do not require accuracy/validation that will help us control our weight.</span>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/01/calorie-information-from-restaurants-packaged-foods.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/01/calorie-information-from-restaurants-packaged-foods.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Chronic Disease</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Community Health</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">behavioral change</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">research</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:48:53 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Health and disease in people over 85</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri"><font color="#000000">Another important editorial in this week&#8217;s BMJ comes from Professor Thomas Peris at U. Boston and describes the growth of the population over 80 and the health of those over 85. Maybe surprising to many is that most consider their health good.<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt; mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"><font color="#000000">[</font></span><i><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #333333; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">BMJ</span></i><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #333333; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"> 2009;339:b4715] <span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Comment:</b> While this is a study in the UK there is not much doubt that similar findings would appear in a study of the US population. Better training of primary care physician for care of the elderly (&gt;80y) is essential.</span></font></font></p>
<p><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #333333; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">
<span style="DISPLAY: inline" class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><a href="http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/01/08/popln_over_80.png"><img style="MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px; FLOAT: left" class="mt-image-left" alt="popln_over_80.png" src="http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/assets_c/2010/01/popln_over_80-thumb-414x342-3257.png" width="414" height="342" /></a></span></span></font></font></p>
<p><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #333333; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"></span>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/01/health-and-disease-in-people-over-85.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/01/health-and-disease-in-people-over-85.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Chronic Disease</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Community Health</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Translational Research</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">epidemiology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">research</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 11:23:08 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Is primary care research a lost cause? </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; COLOR: #333333; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">Chris Del Mar in an editorial in the BMJ rightly credits primary care with championing prevention<sup> </sup>as a key priority for clinicians (something we now take for<sup> </sup>granted) and for increasing our understanding of what happens<sup> </sup>when patients talk to doctors, which has led to the concept<sup> </sup>of patient centredness. But the report goes on to warn of the<sup> </sup>need for more research into the clinical care of diseases encountered<sup> </sup>in primary care, and for more translational research, which<sup> </sup>Del Mar usefully equates with evidence based medicine. [BMJ 2009;339:b4810] <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Comment</b>:: Not only is translational research necessary but also analysis of practice content found in the NAMCS are essential..</span>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/01/is-primary-care-research-a-lost-cause.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2010/01/is-primary-care-research-a-lost-cause.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Surveillance</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">epidemiology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">research</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 10:57:21 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
