<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Dr. Buttery&apos;s Public Health BLOG</title>
      <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:54:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Comparative effectiveness.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="3" face="Calibri">The IOM has just published a monograph on &#8220;</font><a href="http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12648&amp;page=R1"><font size="3" face="Calibri">Comparative Effectiveness Research</font></a><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">&#8221;.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>There are many competing treatments for the major conditions that affect us. There are few studies showing which if any are more effective, other than personal opinions, which doctors and patients can use to choose between them. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span>This monograph speaks to the need to evaluate the various options to improve the rate of recovery and control for <span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span>various disease. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span>It is worth reading by everyone in public health. <o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/07/comparative-effectiveness.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/07/comparative-effectiveness.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Community Health</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Technology</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:54:57 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>EPA Declares Public Health Emergency in Montana Mining Town</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) declared a public health emergency in the Montana towns of Libby and Troy on June 17, 2009. An investigation into the alarming rate of asbestos-related illnesses in the town is what prompted the announcement.&nbsp; Libby is the site of the largest vermiculite deposit in the world and and produced around 80% of the world's vermiculite, the vermiculite was contaminated with tremolite asbestos, well known as a cause of<a href="http://www.asbestos.com/mesothelioma/"> Mesothelioma</a>.&nbsp; Based on a rigorous re-evaluation of the situation on the ground, The EPA will move aggressively on the cleanup efforts and protect the health of the people.&nbsp; $130 million will be spent by the government on asbestos cleanup efforts and also to improve the community health care system for those with asbestos-related illnesses. Approximately $125 million will come from the EPA over the next five years to clean up both Libby and Troy. An extra $6 million will be spent by the Health and Human Services Department (HSS) on medical assistance.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/epa-declares-public-health-emergency-in-montana-mining-town.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/epa-declares-public-health-emergency-in-montana-mining-town.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Environment</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Surveillance</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">epidemiology</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:51:23 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Number of people aged 65 and older worldwide to triple by 2050.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://links.mkt211.com/ctt?kn=24&m=4142392&r=Mzc0NjE5OTk1OQS2&b=0&j=MTI0OTg3MDA4S0&mt=1&rt=0">The AP</a> reports, "The world's 65-and-older population will triple by mid-century to 1 in 6 people, leaving the US and other nations struggling to support the elderly." In fact, the "number of senior citizens has already jumped 23 percent since 2000 to 516 million, according to census estimates released on Tuesday. That's more than double the growth rate for the general population." Currently, seniors "comprise just under 8 percent of the world's 6.8 billion people. But, demographers warn the biggest shift is yet to come. They cite a coming wave of retirements from baby boomers and China's Red Guard generation that will shrink pensions, and add to rising healthcare costs." Data show that, in the US for instance, "residents who are 65 and older currently make up 13 percent of the population, but that will double to 88.5 million by mid-century. In two years, the oldest of the baby boomers will start turning 65. The baby boomer bulge will continue padding the senior population year after year, growing to 1 in 5 US residents by 2030."]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/number-of-people-aged-65-and-o.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/number-of-people-aged-65-and-o.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Economics</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Surveillance</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">geriatrics</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:48:18 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>US officials suggest swine flu may have originated in Asian pigs.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://links.mkt211.com/ctt?kn=17&m=4142392&r=Mzc0NjE5OTk1OQS2&b=0&j=MTI0OTg3MDA4S0&mt=1&rt=0">New York Times</a> reports, "Contrary to the popular assumption that the new swine flu pandemic arose on factory farms in Mexico, federal agriculture officials now believe that it most likely emerged in pigs in Asia, but then traveled to North America in a human." However, "they emphasized that there was no way to prove their theory and only sketchy data underpinning it." Officials note the lack of evidence that the virus "has ever circulated in North American pigs, while there is tantalizing evidence that a closely related 'sister virus' has circulated in Asia." Dr. Amy L. Vincent, a swine flu specialist at the Department of Agriculture, said, "The most likely scenario is that it came over in the mammalian species that moves most freely around the world," people.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/us-officials-suggest-swine-flu.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/us-officials-suggest-swine-flu.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Surveillance</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">epidemiology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">infectious diseases</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:45:31 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Physicians Frequently Fail To Inform Patients About Abnormal Test Results, Study Finds</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://news.med.cornell.edu/wcmc/wcmc_2009/06_22_09.shtml">New research</a> shows that physicians failed to report clinically significant abnormal test results to patients -- or to document that they had informed them -- in one out of every 14 cases of abnormal results. In some medical groups, the failure rate is close to zero; in others it is as high as one in four abnormal results.
The study suggests that five simple, common-sense processes are useful for dealing with test results:
1. All test results are routed to the responsible physician
2. The physician signs off on all results;
3. The practice informs patients of all results, normal and abnormal, at least in general terms;
4. The practice documents that the patient has been informed; and
5. Patients are told to call after a certain time interval if they have not been notified.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/physicians-frequently-fail-to.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/physicians-frequently-fail-to.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Technology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:42:24 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Higher Drinking Age Linked To Less Binge Drinking -- Except In College Students.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[And if you did not think going to college was perilous, just from acquired STDs, now <a href="http://mednews.wustl.edu/news/page/normal/14292.html">a new study </a>has found substantial reductions in binge drinking since the national drinking age was set at 21 two decades ago, with one exception: college students. The rates of binge drinking in male collegians remain unchanged, but the rates in female collegians have increased dramatically.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/higher-drinking-age-linked-to.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/higher-drinking-age-linked-to.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Chronic Disease</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">behavioral change</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:39:21 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Many Floors In U.S. Homes Have &apos;Measurable&apos; Levels Of Pesticides.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[A new article "American Healthy Homes Survey: A National Study of Residential Pesticides Measured from Floor Wipes." Environmental Science & Technology, 2009; 43 (12): 4294 tell us that technology can ,measure past use/abuse of pesticides in homes. <strong>Comment:</strong> However being able to measure a compound at parts per billion or less tell us nothing about possible causes/effects. It become one more tool for the EPA to use to get more funds because of potential peril.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/many-floors-in-us-homes-have-m.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/many-floors-in-us-homes-have-m.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Environment</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Surveillance</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Technology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Toxicology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">research</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:36:06 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Intranasal Zinc Product Linked to Loss of Sense of Smell</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm167065.htm">U.S. Food and Drug Administration today</a> advised consumers to stop using three products marketed over-the-counter as cold remedies because they are associated with the loss of sense of smell (anosmia). Anosmia may be long-lasting or permanent.
The products are:
    --Zicam Cold Remedy Nasal Gel
    --Zicam Cold Remedy Nasal Swabs
    --Zicam Cold Remedy Swabs, Kids Size (a discontinued product)
The FDA has received more than 130 reports of loss of sense of smell associated with the use of these three Zicam products. In these reports, many people who experienced a loss of smell said the condition occurred with the first dose; others reported a loss of the sense of smell after multiple uses of the products.
"Loss of sense of smell is a serious risk for people who use these products for relief from cold symptoms," said Janet Woodcock, M.D., director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). "We are concerned that consumers may unknowingly use a product that could cause serious harm, and therefore we are advising them not to use these products for any reason."
Comment: One more OTC product found sufficiently harmful to withdraw from stores.   It is one more example of a highly advertised product that not only does not perform as touted but is in fact dangerous.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/intranasal-zinc-product-linked.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/intranasal-zinc-product-linked.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Surveillance</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">complementary substances</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:49:09 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Scientists say &quot;probiotic&quot; label misused by food industry, misunderstood by consumers.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The Chicago Tribune (6/18) reports, "Probiotics...have broken out of the dairy case and are colonizing other areas of the supermarket" because they are "thought to aid digestion and support the immune system." But as more manufacturers fortify their foodstuffs, experts are beginning to "caution that the word 'probiotic' is widely misused by the industry and misunderstood by consumers." Currently, "there is no standard definition of probiotics, according to the" FDA. "But scientists generally say the term refers to foods, beverages, or supplements containing live microorganisms that studies show promote health when people take enough of them. Without studies, products shouldn't be called probiotic."   <strong>Comment:  </strong>one more piece of false advertising, usually from Dannon for their Yogurt, who are currently being investigated by the European Union for false statements.. There are a number of beliefs among credible clinicians, for specific purposes but few if any clinical studies that support these beliefs.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/scientists-say-probiotic-label.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/scientists-say-probiotic-label.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">complementary substances</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:48:11 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>IUPUI Study Finds Fast Food Not a Weighty Problem for Kids</title>
         <description><![CDATA[A new study by Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) researchers contradicts the conventional wisdom that living near a fast food outlet increases weight in children and that living near supermarkets, which sell fresh fruit and vegetables as well as so-called junk food, lowers weight.  The IUPUI investigators in economics, pediatrics, geography and urban planning compared children's weights over time before and after one of these food purveyors moved near the childrens' residences. Living near a fast food outlet had little effect on weight and living near a supermarket did not lower it.  <strong>Comment: </strong>One more study contradicting a long held belief by many behaviorists.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/iupui-study-finds-fast-food-no.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/iupui-study-finds-fast-food-no.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Chronic Disease</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Surveillance</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">epidemiology</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:44:06 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Farmed Fish May Pose Risk For Mad Cow Disease.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://">University of Louisville neurologist </a>Robert P. Friedland, M.D., questions the safety of eating farmed fish in today's Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, adding a new worry to concerns about the nation's food supply. Friedland and his co-authors suggest farmed fish could transmit Creutzfeldt Jakob disease--commonly known as mad cow disease--if they are fed byproducts rendered from cows. The scientists urge government regulators to ban feeding cow meat or bone meal to fish until the safety of this common practice can be confirmed. <strong>Comment:</strong> This position is unsupported by any studies and seems to be published only to gain notoriety]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/farmed-fish-may-pose-risk-for.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/farmed-fish-may-pose-risk-for.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Food Safety</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">infectious diseases</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:41:06 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>FDA Warns Web Sites against Marketing Fraudulent H1N1 Flu Virus Claims</title>
         <description>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is enforcing the laws that protect consumers from illegal products marketed through the Internet that claim to diagnose, prevent, mitigate, treat or cure the 2009 H1N1 flu virus.  On May 1, 2009, the FDA warned consumers regarding products related to the 2009 H1N1 flu virus offered on the Internet. The products involved are those that are promoted and marketed to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure the 2009 H1N1 flu virus but are not approved, cleared, or authorized by the FDA. The agency advised operators of offending Web sites that they must take immediate action to ensure that they are not marketing products intended to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure the 2009 H1N1 flu virus that have not been cleared, approved, or authorized by the FDA.</description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/fda-warns-web-sites-against-ma.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/fda-warns-web-sites-against-ma.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Surveillance</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:10:07 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Impaired Male Fertility</title>
         <description><![CDATA[According to a study <a href="http://www.lumc.edu/Template/luhs/newsrelease/reportdetail.cfm?autonumber=973440983">from Loyola University </a>Health System almost everything impairs fertility in males, the latest being a laptop balanced on your knees! The list, in addition to the laptop includes avoiding:
 	hot tubs 
 	Wearing boxers instead of briefs 
 	Refraining from ejaculating too frequently (the recommendation is to only engage in sexual intercourse every other day around ovulation) 
 	Exercising moderately (one hour, three to five times per week) 
 	Avoiding exercise that can generate heat or trauma to the genital area 
 	Eating well 
 	Taking a daily multivitamin 
 	Getting eight hours of sleep per night 
 	Staying hydrated and limiting caffeine to no more than two cups per day 
 	Refraining from smoking 
 	Avoiding drugs and excessive alcohol use 
 	Minimizing exposure to toxins 
 	Avoiding excessive weight gain or weight loss 
 	Practicing stress reduction techniques 
 	<strong>Comment:</strong> This behavioral list might be used to encourage these activities and see if we can reduce the population explosion.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/impaired-male-fertility.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/impaired-male-fertility.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">behavioral change</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:05:05 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>New Congressional bill is NOT public health.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[One more example of congress being bought out by commercial interests is the new Tobacco Bill passing oversight on tobacco use to the FDA. Meanwhile, yesterday, Fitch Ratings, a Chicago-based industry and market analysis firm issued a report in which it concluded that the FDA tobacco legislation will "revitalize" the tobacco industry and enable it to more successfully sell its products. In this report they focus on what is probably the most damaging part of the new FDA/Tobacco bill from a public health perspective -- the section that encourages cigarette manufacturers to manufacture and market  "Potentially Reduced Exposure Cigarettes" with absolutely no scientific proof that the "reduced exposure" will reduce risk. This scientifically-unfounded gift to the cigarette makers, combined with the de-facto ban on all new truly reduced risk products should assure high levels of cigarette sales and continuation of high cigarette-related death rates for decades to come..  <strong>Comment:</strong> despite backing from the AMA and APHA this is not a bill that supports the Public's health.  Both these organizations are politically naïve except when it comes to  their bottom line.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/new-congressional-bill-is-not.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/new-congressional-bill-is-not.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Chronic Disease</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Community Health</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Economics</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Prevention</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">epidemiology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:00:03 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Geography And History Shape Genetic Differences In Humans</title>
         <description><![CDATA[ScienceDaily (June 7, 2009) -- <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1000500">New research </a>indicates that natural selection may shape the human genome much more slowly than previously thought. Other factors -- the movements of humans within and among continents, the expansions and contractions of populations, and the vagaries of genetic chance - have heavily influenced the distribution of genetic variations in populations around the world. <strong>Comment:</strong> Is there any chance that these studies can lead to a change in racial animositt? We are all mongrels.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/geography-and-history-shape-ge.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.vcu.edu/cbuttery/2009/06/geography-and-history-shape-ge.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">geriatrics</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">policy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">research</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 14:07:41 -0500</pubDate>
         
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
